When the Jack of All Trades is the Master of Success: A conversation with Pavitra Darbar
What if the most valuable expertise wasn't knowing one subject deeply, but understanding how seemingly unrelated ideas connect?
We're often encouraged to specialize early, to choose a niche, master it, and stay within its boundaries. Yet some of the most interesting perspectives emerge from people who refuse to think in straight lines.
For Pavitra Darbar, curiosity has never followed a single discipline. Hir interests span luxury branding, psychology, theology, fashion, culture, storytelling, and human behaviour, not as separate passions, but as interconnected ways of understanding why people believe, create, aspire, and connect. Whether exploring the psychology behind luxury brands, studying theology alongside science, or examining how stories shape identity, he approaches each field through the same question: What does this reveal about people?
In this conversation with Conversations by Brains In You, Pavitra reflects on building an interdisciplinary mindset, overcoming the fear of public speaking through TEDx, finding meaning in psychology and theology, and why curiosity, empathy, and cognitive flexibility may become some of the most valuable skills in an increasingly complex world.
Q1.
Your interests span luxury branding, psychology, fashion, theology, culture,
and even the occult fields that many people wouldn't naturally connect. How did
these seemingly different interests come together to shape the way you see the
world?
Honestly,
most of this goes back to being a curious kid who noticed things other people
didn't. It started with questions about my own religion. But those questions
never really stayed contained, I ended up reading about other faiths too, just
trying to understand belief itself, not only the one I grew up with. That's
basically where my whole occult and spiritual journey began.
I
think I've always had a strong intuition, even as a child, I perceived things a
bit differently and picked up on things others missed. That peculiarity is what
pushed me to actually study the occult seriously instead of brushing it off as
"just a phase" or something weird. But alongside that intuition, I
also had a genuine love for science, and that created an interesting tension in
me. I didn't just want to believe things, I wanted to understand and justify
religion scientifically and logically too. That's actually what led me to
ecospirituality, and to the psychological and sociological reasoning behind why
religion exists in the first place, why humans across every culture seem to
need belief systems, and where that need actually originates from. In a way,
science didn't replace my spirituality, it gave me a framework to understand
it.
Creativity
was a big part of my childhood too. I genuinely wanted to be a fashion
designer. But once I saw how hard that path actually is, and after talking to
my dad, I pivoted into business instead. I didn't really leave that love behind
though, I just found a way to channel it into fashion, art and heritage through
a different career.
And
underneath all of this, I was a kid who felt things for other people really
early on. Almost an instinctive empathy for lives that weren't mine, before I
even had the language for it. Looking back, it feels like an early, childlike
version of sonder, that realization that everyone around you is living a whole
life as real as yours.
But
that empathy was also exhausting. Most kids don't have to deal with absorbing
that much of what other people feel. So I learned boundaries pretty early too,
not really as a choice, more like something I had to figure out just to protect
myself. That mix of sensitivity and boundaries, along with my interest in
theology, is honestly what pulled me toward psychology, especially mental health
and how the mind works.
So none of these interests really grew on their own. They all came from the same curious kid, just showing up later as religion, the occult, fashion, business and psychology.
Q2.
You delivered a TEDx talk while still in school, an opportunity many aspire to
for years. Beyond public speaking, what did preparing for that stage teach you
about communicating ideas that genuinely stay with people?
Honestly, I was actually quite scared of public speaking. But I decided to put myself forward for TEDx anyway, mostly to challenge myself and push past that fear rather than let it hold me back. Looking back, I'm genuinely grateful I got that opportunity while still in school, it changed a lot for me.
My
talk was about manifestation and the power of belief, so ironically, the
biggest lesson I learned was about the power of connection, not just ideas.
Getting
comfortable on stage and finding the right personal story to tell were honestly
the hardest parts of prepping. I knew what I wanted to say, but figuring out
how to say it in a way that would actually land with people was a different
challenge entirely.
During
the talk, I added a joke to lighten things up a bit, along with a few personal
anecdotes. When I saw people nodding along at those moments rather than the
more "factual" parts, it hit me that people don't really connect with
information, they connect with emotion and shared human experience. You can
give someone every stat and every reason to believe something, but it's the
story or the feeling behind it that actually stays with them.
That
realization has shaped how I think about business and marketing too. If you
want to sell something, you can't just talk about features, you have to tell
people how it will make them feel. This is especially true for luxury goods,
where people aren't really buying a product, they're buying an emotion, an
identity, or a feeling of belonging.
So
in a strange way, a talk about belief ended up teaching me something very
practical: that belief itself, in a brand, an idea, or even yourself, is built
on feeling understood, not just being informed.
Q3.
During the High School Startup League, you were exposed to entrepreneurs and
mentors at an early age. Was there a conversation or moment from that experience
that permanently changed the way you think about business or innovation?
But
the experience also gave me a pretty early, and honestly unexpected, look into
how the real world can work. In the final round, we realised the competition
wasn't as fair as we'd assumed. The production team handed us a script and an
idea that was completely different from the one we'd originally been selected
on. We didn't think much of it until another team pitched the exact same script
we'd been given, and they won a funding offer almost instantly, with far fewer
questions asked than we'd faced. It was hard not to notice how biased the whole
process felt at that point.
It
was disappointing, honestly. But it also taught me something that's stayed with
me since: no matter how unfair a situation feels, you have to stand by your own
morals and be willing to stand up for yourself. The world doesn't always play
fair, but that doesn't mean you compromise on what you know is right.
Q4.
Luxury branding is often misunderstood as simply selling expensive products.
What drew you toward this field, and what do you think people overlook about
the psychology and cultural significance behind luxury brands?
That's
what people overlook the most, I think. They assume luxury branding is just
about marking up a product and calling it exclusive. But it's actually one of
the most psychologically intensive forms of branding there is. It requires a
deep understanding of identity, aspiration, culture, and even insecurity,
because ultimately, you're not selling an object, you're selling a feeling of
belonging to something bigger, an idea of who someone becomes by owning it.
That
intersection, of culture, craftsmanship, and psychology, is honestly what
intrigues me the most about this space.
Honestly, this one comes from a very personal place. I always felt different growing up, misunderstood, or sometimes just not understood at all. In trying to make sense of myself, I started reading about archetypes, mostly because I could never fit neatly into just one. That actually disturbed me as a kid, I couldn't point to a character or a "type" and say, that's me. I felt too unique, too quirky to be boxed in, and that used to bother me more than I let on.
So
to understand myself and how my own mind worked, I started reading about
trauma, identity, disorders, intergenerational trauma, group dynamics, all of
it. Part of this also came from the fact that I was always extremely perceptive
of other people's behaviour and energy, even as a child, but I had no real
framework or "scientific metric" to explain what I was picking up on.
Psychology became that framework for me.
It
gave me a sense of reasoning behind things I could previously only sense
intuitively. It also made me a lot better at assessing people. If I'm being
honest, I initially used it almost like a tool, to gauge what kind of person
someone was, how they might think or react. Over time, that understanding
became less about analysing people from a distance and more about genuinely
empathising with them, which now shapes how I lead, create, and even just talk
to people day to day.
There's
also a well-documented link between this kind of broad curiosity and something
psychologists call tolerance for ambiguity, basically, how comfortable someone
is with uncertainty and complexity rather than needing everything to fit into a
single, defined box. This trait falls under Openness to Experience, one of the
Big Five personality traits, and people who score higher on it tend to be
curious, seek out novel experiences and ideas, and have diverse interests,
particularly in philosophical and artistic areas (Park, 2022). Interestingly,
being exposed to creative, open-ended thinking seems to increase people's
openness to ambiguity and novelty even further, almost like a feedback loop,
the more you explore, the more comfortable you get with not having a single
fixed answer (Zenasni et al., 2008).
I
live by the quote, "jack of all trades, master of none, but often better
than the master of one." As of today, I dabble in almost everything, more
like a polymath than a specialist. I play badminton, I've tried my hand at
guitar, I love singing, I deeply appreciate classical dance forms and enjoy
folk dances too, I'm a mandala artist, I love exploring art and fashion and
reading about techniques behind them, and alongside pursuing a career in
business, I read about psychology, theology, and biology regularly just to stay
curious.
I
think all of this allows me to develop holistically rather than narrowly. It
keeps me mentally open to new ideas, comfortable with ambiguity instead of
threatened by it, and honestly, it's made me a more well-rounded thinker
overall, someone who can draw connections other people might miss simply
because they're only looking through one lens.
Theology and culture have been a part of me since childhood, long before I understood why they mattered so much to me. But with age and certain personal experiences, I found myself diving deeper into the occult too, partly to make sense of my surroundings and partly to understand myself better. Those experiences have shaped a lot of how I see the world, and honestly, they make for great stories, ones that also help me guide other people through similar questions or moments of their own.
When
it comes to credibility, I try to go straight to the source wherever possible.
I read scripture in its rawest form, or as close to the original translation as
I can get, and cross-reference it across multiple translations and resources
rather than relying on a single interpretation. I've also found that, more
often than not, the right information or the right people tend to find their
way to me at the right time, almost like the field reveals itself to those who
are genuinely looking.
I
won't pretend blind belief and misinformation aren't real problems in this
space, they are. But what keeps me drawn to it is that it's one of those rare
fields where you never really stop learning. There's always another layer to
uncover, another translation to compare, another perspective to sit with.
Honestly, I don't think it's just one of
these, aesthetics, narrative, or psychology. I think it's all of them working
together, in different phases, that actually creates a lasting impression.
I write poetry as well, and one thing
people often tell me is that what draws them in isn't just the words
themselves, but the flow, the narrative, and the psychological undertones
running quietly beneath it. I think the same principle applies to branding.
It's never just about how a brand looks. It's about the storytelling behind it,
the lifestyle and aesthetic it offers its audience, and the perceived value or
status it adds to someone's identity simply by being associated with it.
But for a connection to actually last, I
think it comes down to two things: reliability and nostalgia. A brand needs to
feel dependable enough that people trust it repeatedly, and at the same time,
it needs to tap into something that feels familiar or emotionally resonant, almost
like it's reminding you of a feeling you already know. When aesthetics,
narrative, psychology, reliability, and nostalgia all come together, that's
when a brand stops being just a product and starts becoming part of someone's
personal story.
About Conversations by Brains in You
Conversations by Brains in You is a curated interview series featuring students, professionals, entrepreneurs, creators, researchers, and changemakers whose journeys offer meaningful lessons beyond conventional achievements.
Rather than focusing solely on titles or milestones, each conversation explores the decisions, experiences, challenges, and perspectives that shaped the individual behind the profile. The aim is to create a growing repository of practical insights that help students and young professionals navigate their own careers with greater clarity, productivity, integrity, and purpose.
Every featured conversation is thoughtfully selected with the belief that authentic experiences can inspire informed decisions, lifelong learning, and better human development.
Comments
Post a Comment